THE TERMINOLOGY OF INCLUSIVENESS IN THE FIELD OF ESP FOR AGRICULTURAL STUDIES PUBLISHED
Alina URLICA, Carmen DUMITRESCU, Marius Robert LUNGU, Iasmina IOSIM USVT 'King Michael I' from Timisoara Romania iasminaiosim@usvt.roThe term “inclusive” has made a career in the last 15 years: there are at least 74 phrases containing this term, 18 of which belong to the field of agriculture, thus being of interest to our students: “inclusive agribusiness”, “inclusive (agricultural) market system”, “inclusive agricultural food system”, “inclusive agricultural value chain”, “inclusive agriculture / farming”, “inclusive business model”, “inclusive contract”, “inclusive development”, “inclusive growth”, “inclusive investment”, “inclusive market (access)”, “inclusive ownership”, “inclusive participation”, “inclusive regulation”, and “inclusive rural transformation”. This study is an attempt to clarify the meaning of the target language (inclusive agricultural phrases) and to see in what ways these are relevant to our holistic educational purposes. The term “inclusive” has been widely in use in recent years. It has been deemed useful by the authors of this study to identify phrases containing this term and to analyze their relationship to the field of natural sciences. We conclude that 18 terms from our studied corpus belong to the field of agriculture, therefore being relevant to the field of study of major interest to our students. Thirty-nine journals and official documents were browsed for studies regarding inclusive-labelled issues. The systematic literature review of original research articles was conducted considering the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Literature Reviews and the Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)” method
inclusiveness, inclusive language, agriculture / farming, terminology
agronomy
Presentation: oral presentation
Back